<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Back to Miami with the Funkoverse Strategy Game: Golden Girls	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamewardbound.com/funkoverse-strategy-game-golden-girls-solo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamewardbound.com/funkoverse-strategy-game-golden-girls-solo/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=funkoverse-strategy-game-golden-girls-solo</link>
	<description>A Solo Board Game Blog by Jessica</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 04:07:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jessica		</title>
		<link>https://gamewardbound.com/funkoverse-strategy-game-golden-girls-solo/#comment-684</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2022 14:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamewardbound.com/?p=6768#comment-684</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamewardbound.com/funkoverse-strategy-game-golden-girls-solo/#comment-683&quot;&gt;RogerBW&lt;/a&gt;.

I think mixing the sets would be lots of fun! Problem is that I didn&#039;t enjoy the overall system, so investing in more is likely a recipe for disaster.

Understandable about your issues! I think having a connection with the characters is important, as is enjoying the general visual style. I&#039;m still oddly upset about how most of the ladies are pretty generic and key parts of the show are missing entirely. Guess it&#039;s just not something for either of us!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamewardbound.com/funkoverse-strategy-game-golden-girls-solo/#comment-683">RogerBW</a>.</p>
<p>I think mixing the sets would be lots of fun! Problem is that I didn&#8217;t enjoy the overall system, so investing in more is likely a recipe for disaster.</p>
<p>Understandable about your issues! I think having a connection with the characters is important, as is enjoying the general visual style. I&#8217;m still oddly upset about how most of the ladies are pretty generic and key parts of the show are missing entirely. Guess it&#8217;s just not something for either of us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: RogerBW		</title>
		<link>https://gamewardbound.com/funkoverse-strategy-game-golden-girls-solo/#comment-683</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RogerBW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2022 13:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamewardbound.com/?p=6768#comment-683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maybe it would work better if they were fighting Harry Potter or Jaws, which I think is a thing you can do with these sets?

Two strikes against these for me: the big one is that I find the figure style unpleasant to look at, and the small one is that I&#039;m not a huge fan of any of the shows they&#039;ve got the licences for (indeed I&#039;ve never seen this one; yeah yeah I know). So it could be the best game in the world and it would still have an uphill struggle to get my attention.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it would work better if they were fighting Harry Potter or Jaws, which I think is a thing you can do with these sets?</p>
<p>Two strikes against these for me: the big one is that I find the figure style unpleasant to look at, and the small one is that I&#8217;m not a huge fan of any of the shows they&#8217;ve got the licences for (indeed I&#8217;ve never seen this one; yeah yeah I know). So it could be the best game in the world and it would still have an uphill struggle to get my attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
