<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: One by One by… One? Square One as a Solo Abstract Game	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamewardbound.com/square-one-solo-play/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamewardbound.com/square-one-solo-play/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=square-one-solo-play</link>
	<description>A Solo Board Game Blog by Jessica</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:58:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jessica		</title>
		<link>https://gamewardbound.com/square-one-solo-play/#comment-8776</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamewardbound.com/?p=14343#comment-8776</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamewardbound.com/square-one-solo-play/#comment-8772&quot;&gt;Leander&lt;/a&gt;.

Good question, and I remember I picked this up since I heard good things about that one! It feels like this almost took that abstract and... Abstracted it some more? Meaning the polyominoes are now just single squares in this one. I&#039;m afraid that means I don&#039;t have a helpful comparison to make since I never played the original game, although I like your wife&#039;s idea of making her own rules when playing abstract games! For me, this one kind of went a little too far being an abstract of an abstract game. Definitely has potential for the right audience, though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamewardbound.com/square-one-solo-play/#comment-8772">Leander</a>.</p>
<p>Good question, and I remember I picked this up since I heard good things about that one! It feels like this almost took that abstract and&#8230; Abstracted it some more? Meaning the polyominoes are now just single squares in this one. I&#8217;m afraid that means I don&#8217;t have a helpful comparison to make since I never played the original game, although I like your wife&#8217;s idea of making her own rules when playing abstract games! For me, this one kind of went a little too far being an abstract of an abstract game. Definitely has potential for the right audience, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Leander		</title>
		<link>https://gamewardbound.com/square-one-solo-play/#comment-8772</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leander]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 04:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamewardbound.com/?p=14343#comment-8772</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Curious if you&#039;ve played Project L and could offer a comparison? My wife likes to make her own rules when playing abstract games (like I want to collect one of each color tile/I want to get at least 5 of all one tile/I only want primary colors/etc to add spice to the abstract-ness)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious if you&#8217;ve played Project L and could offer a comparison? My wife likes to make her own rules when playing abstract games (like I want to collect one of each color tile/I want to get at least 5 of all one tile/I only want primary colors/etc to add spice to the abstract-ness)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
