<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Finding Cozy Homes for the Animals in Winterhaven Woods	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamewardbound.com/winterhaven-woods-solo-play/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamewardbound.com/winterhaven-woods-solo-play/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=winterhaven-woods-solo-play</link>
	<description>A Solo Board Game Blog by Jessica</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:48:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jessica		</title>
		<link>https://gamewardbound.com/winterhaven-woods-solo-play/#comment-786</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamewardbound.com/?p=7210#comment-786</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamewardbound.com/winterhaven-woods-solo-play/#comment-782&quot;&gt;RogerBW&lt;/a&gt;.

Good point! I&#039;ll have to think about that some more as I think about my learning process with rulebooks. I definitely struggle more with the ones that have random exceptions, rather than the ones that have clear top-level rules that apply in practically every case.

I don&#039;t have a problem when an asymmetric faction bends a rule or a card provides a special bonsu, yet it&#039;s when those principles have special cases directly in the rulebook that I get more confused. Or the worst case... When an exception exists, but there are no rules to explain how to fully handle it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamewardbound.com/winterhaven-woods-solo-play/#comment-782">RogerBW</a>.</p>
<p>Good point! I&#8217;ll have to think about that some more as I think about my learning process with rulebooks. I definitely struggle more with the ones that have random exceptions, rather than the ones that have clear top-level rules that apply in practically every case.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem when an asymmetric faction bends a rule or a card provides a special bonsu, yet it&#8217;s when those principles have special cases directly in the rulebook that I get more confused. Or the worst case&#8230; When an exception exists, but there are no rules to explain how to fully handle it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: RogerBW		</title>
		<link>https://gamewardbound.com/winterhaven-woods-solo-play/#comment-782</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RogerBW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamewardbound.com/?p=7210#comment-782</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I do love that art, particularly the fox – but I think especially in the last ten years the standard for game design has moved towards much &quot;flatter&quot; rules, strong general principles that apply in multiple places with relatively few exceptions, even for complex games.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do love that art, particularly the fox – but I think especially in the last ten years the standard for game design has moved towards much &#8220;flatter&#8221; rules, strong general principles that apply in multiple places with relatively few exceptions, even for complex games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jessica		</title>
		<link>https://gamewardbound.com/winterhaven-woods-solo-play/#comment-715</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 15:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamewardbound.com/?p=7210#comment-715</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamewardbound.com/winterhaven-woods-solo-play/#comment-713&quot;&gt;Brenoit&lt;/a&gt;.

It was shocking and I actually redid my rating a few times to see if I was being unfair, but unfortunately, this was where it fell. The artwork is definitely something to admire! Just wish there was more of a game underneath the surface to enjoy. Hopefully, it finds it audience or someone who creates an unoffical solo mode that&#039;s fun and challenging!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamewardbound.com/winterhaven-woods-solo-play/#comment-713">Brenoit</a>.</p>
<p>It was shocking and I actually redid my rating a few times to see if I was being unfair, but unfortunately, this was where it fell. The artwork is definitely something to admire! Just wish there was more of a game underneath the surface to enjoy. Hopefully, it finds it audience or someone who creates an unoffical solo mode that&#8217;s fun and challenging!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jessica		</title>
		<link>https://gamewardbound.com/winterhaven-woods-solo-play/#comment-714</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 15:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamewardbound.com/?p=7210#comment-714</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamewardbound.com/winterhaven-woods-solo-play/#comment-711&quot;&gt;Anonymous&lt;/a&gt;.

You&#039;re welcome, and I appreciate the kind words! The worst feeling for me is when a game doesn&#039;t work for me, especially one I&#039;m excited about. I hope I was still able to point out some of the positives here, though, and although it won&#039;t be sticking around for multiplayer, it sounds like that&#039;s where it might work a little better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamewardbound.com/winterhaven-woods-solo-play/#comment-711">Anonymous</a>.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re welcome, and I appreciate the kind words! The worst feeling for me is when a game doesn&#8217;t work for me, especially one I&#8217;m excited about. I hope I was still able to point out some of the positives here, though, and although it won&#8217;t be sticking around for multiplayer, it sounds like that&#8217;s where it might work a little better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brenoit		</title>
		<link>https://gamewardbound.com/winterhaven-woods-solo-play/#comment-713</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brenoit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 07:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamewardbound.com/?p=7210#comment-713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow. I don&#039;t think I recall you giving such a low grade to a game. I went long ways to print it out and make a cute box for it. And then I only played it once, not feeling completely right with the rules. The graphic design is such a piece of art, though...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I don&#8217;t think I recall you giving such a low grade to a game. I went long ways to print it out and make a cute box for it. And then I only played it once, not feeling completely right with the rules. The graphic design is such a piece of art, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://gamewardbound.com/winterhaven-woods-solo-play/#comment-711</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 11:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gamewardbound.com/?p=7210#comment-711</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this review. I was looking at this when it was being funded and my interest was primarily driven by the art style. It can&#039;t be easy writing negative reviews but I appreciate your reasoning and you articulated the problems well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this review. I was looking at this when it was being funded and my interest was primarily driven by the art style. It can&#8217;t be easy writing negative reviews but I appreciate your reasoning and you articulated the problems well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
